Where each shipment is insured on its own, cover begins with a human act — somebody has to file the declaration. If the person is away, if the invoice value is revised upward afterwards, or if the vessel sails earlier than planned, the gap is real. An Open Policy moves the trigger: cover attaches to the fact of shipment within the agreed scope.
Quote, declare and issue a certificate for every single shipment → shipments inside the agreed scope are handled by periodic declaration and settlement.
Operated on a monthly settlement cycle.
Cover attaches on the fact of shipment within the agreed scope. It does not wait for a declaration to be filed.
The policy can be structured so the final invoice value is captured at the declaration stage.
Quoting, declaring and issuing for each shipment collapse into one declaration and settlement per month.
If a loss occurs, N2N Insurance Brokerage supports the adjustment and claim process.
The hardest marine cargo losses are rarely arguments about scope of cover. They are the shipments that had no certificate at all. Under per-shipment declaration, the act of shipping and the act of insuring are performed by different people at different moments, so they can structurally fall out of step.
The point. The problem is not that mistakes happen. It is that a mistake immediately changes whether cover exists. An Open Policy breaks that link.
How the same situation is handled under each structure.
| Situation | Per-shipment cover | Open Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Attachment trigger | The filing — cover starts only once someone files | The fact of shipment within the agreed scope |
| Handover or absence | The vessel can sail with no cover in place | No effect on attachment (declaration is for settlement) |
| Invoice value revised upward | Under-insured — exposure to average / pro-rata settlement | Final value captured at declaration (within limits) |
| Sailing brought forward | Cover after transit begins may be restricted | No effect if within the agreed scope |
| Weekend or night shipment | Deferred to the next working day | No effect |
| Administration | Quote → declare → issue, for every shipment | One declaration and settlement per month |
| Documentation | A certificate per shipment | Master policy, plus a certificate per shipment where required |
| Declaration duty | Not applicable | Yes — the procedure for settlement and notice |
The comparison above sets out the general structural difference. The actual attachment point, scope and limits follow the individual agreement and the insurer's policy wording.
Look back over the last twelve months. These are the situations that recur under per-shipment cover.
If any of these apply, the same situation is likely to recur. It is worth asking whether the risk can be handled by structure rather than by an individual's diligence.
An Open Policy should not be understood as "every shipment is handled automatically". Attachment of cover and the declaration duty are separate obligations, and the following remain the policyholder's to manage.
To be precise. The declaration is the procedure for premium settlement and notice. However, the treatment of a missed declaration, the extent to which late declaration is permitted, and how deliberate non-declaration is dealt with all vary by the insurer's wording and by the individual agreement. Fixing the agreed scope and the declaration procedure in writing at inception is therefore the practical heart of the matter.
The more repetitive the commodity and the more consistent the route, the easier it is to define the agreed scope precisely.
Hazardous or perishable commodities, high-value single sendings, and routes touching sanctioned territories require separate discussion. Acceptance and terms are confirmed after the insurer's underwriting review.
Claims handling under an Open Policy follows the same route as under an individual certificate. The more complete the file, the faster the adjustment.
Whether the file is complete often decides the outcome at the adjustment stage. Notice to the carrier in particular is time-barred from the date of delivery, so it should be served as soon as damage is discovered.
A shipper operating on per-shipment cover. At the point a member of staff changed, a declaration was missed, and it was established only afterwards that the shipment had sailed uninsured. What the review found was not carelessness by any individual, but that a per-shipment structure contains no mechanism to reveal the omission at the time of shipment. A move to an Open Policy structure — attaching cover to the fact of shipment — was then considered.
(General industry example) · Anonymised advisory case. No particular outcome is guaranteed.
Size alone does not decide it. Commodity, route, shipping frequency and loss history are considered together. In practice, the figures below are the starting point for a review.
Reviewed from an annual marine cargo premium volume of about KRW 2 million
Reviewed from an annual marine cargo premium volume of about KRW 20 million
If the size threshold has kept you from looking at an Open Policy at all, it is worth a second look. Where the commodity and the route are consistent, a workable structure is sometimes possible at a smaller premium volume. Acceptance, rating and cover terms are confirmed after the insurer's underwriting review.
Cover attaches to shipments falling within the agreed scope — commodity, route, mode of carriage and limits. Cargo or routes outside that scope, and shipments exceeding the limits, are matters for separate agreement, and the treatment of a missed declaration depends on the insurer's wording. Fixing the agreed scope clearly before inception is what matters.
Under an Open Policy the declaration is the procedure for premium settlement and notice. However, the treatment of a missed declaration, the extent to which late declaration is permitted, and how deliberate non-declaration is handled vary by wording and by agreement. In practice we recommend putting a monthly batch declaration routine in place.
The trigger for attachment. Per-shipment cover turns on a person filing; an Open Policy turns on the fact of shipment within the agreed scope. That difference is what changes the outcome when a member of staff is away, a handover is incomplete, a schedule moves, or a shipment goes out after hours.
Under per-shipment cover the sum insured is fixed at the time of filing, so a later increase can leave the shipment under-insured. An Open Policy can be structured to capture the final value at the declaration stage. Treatment of any amount above the agreed limit follows the terms of the agreement.
We review an Open Policy structure from an annual marine cargo premium volume of about KRW 2 million. Size alone does not decide it — commodity, route and loss history are considered together. Acceptance and terms are confirmed after the insurer's underwriting review.
Yes. The expiry of the existing certificates, any open losses and any outstanding declarations need to be settled first so the transition leaves no gap in cover. That is why we review the current certificates together with the recent settlement record.
A master policy is issued first. Where an individual document is needed — for a letter of credit, for example — a certificate is issued for that shipment. The form required can differ by the terms of the credit, so it is worth confirming in advance.
No. Our commission is paid by the insurer and is not added to the premium payable by the policyholder, in accordance with Article 98 of the Insurance Business Act (prohibition on the provision of special benefits).
For a one-off or irregular shipment, the marine cargo estimator gives an indicative range first. The actual premium is confirmed after the insurer's underwriting review.
Send your current certificates or a recent shipment list and we will identify where the gaps are and come back to you.
An Open Policy takes effect after the insurer's underwriting review and the conclusion of a settlement agreement. Our commission is paid by the insurer and is not added to the premium payable by the policyholder (Insurance Business Act, Article 98).
N2N Insurance Brokerage is an independent insurance broker registered with the Financial Supervisory Service of Korea (Registration No. 2026-012201). Our placements are arranged with insurers authorised in Korea, so before we quote we need one of the following to be true.
Where the insured, the risk and the entire transit all sit outside Korea, we are unable to assist. A number of jurisdictions prohibit non-admitted insurance, and a policy issued in Korea may not be recognised locally for customs clearance or under a letter of credit. In those cases we would encourage you to approach a broker or insurer licensed in the country concerned.
Terms, conditions and acceptance are determined by the insurer's underwriting review.